Troisième mandat de Bush

De : ClickGraphics - Date : Lun 8 nov 2004 06:14 E-mail : "ClickGraphics" Groupes : alt.america, alt.america.online, alt.conspiracy.america-at-war, alt.revolution.american.second, alt.society.arab-american.studies It will never be easier to remove Bush from Power. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bush is leading the American people on a road that will lead to the eventual destruction of America. Since World War II America has been a pillar of strength on many fronts for the global community. It has pioneered excellence in the areas of: Human Rights and Equality. Freedom of Speech. Democracy. Opportunity. Military stablity across the entire globe. Economic might and stability. Scientific prowess and technological development. Freedom of communication and interaction. Entertainment and lifestyle revolutions (Hollywood and Internet being the most obvious example). However, nothing is without a negative, and with these achievements has come: Pride to the point of arrogance. An aggressive and interventionalistic foreign policy. Global capatalistic franchises that tax foreign economies in an unbalanced way (easy example; fast food chains). Economic and Environmental strategies that affect the global community but which the global community has no welcome say in. An increasing distrust and alienation of particular segments of the global community. The list (for both pros and cons) could go on indefinately. The current stance of the American people, however, (and in particular the declaration of the "War on Terrorism") has brought America to a cross-road that could lead through some very difficult times for the entire globe, but ultimately for Americans themselves. America was attacked in a shocking way on September 11, 2001, and has responded in an astounding, violent, and completely inappropriate way. The Taliban, said to house the elusive Al Quada, was broken apart and scattered to form a political waste-land in Afghanistan, filled with the most basic of basic Fuedal systems of government; one which will never pose a politic threat to America in the near future, and which cannot gain any decent foothold in the global political scene. Iraq, which has been a thorn in America's side since Saddam Hussein, aided to power by the United States government to combat Iran on a local front, decided he didn't want to play America's pawn anymore, and became a political nuisance. He refused to cooperate, refused to obey, threatened this and that, and became a polical radical in general. America decided he needed to be removed. Sanctions were put in place, to starve his economy, and provoke Iraqiis into turning on him. They failed. Saddam fought back by trying to acquire Kuwait, and fuel its economy by force, at the same time wounding American interests. A very bad political manuever, and one which saw Saddam's forces beaten back to deep within their own borders again. Weapons Inspectors were brought in by the UN to cripple and dismantle his Weapons Programs (which included Nuclear, Chemical, Biological and to a far greater extent Conventional Weapons, such as SCUDs and other ranged weapons that could be used to attack neighbouring countries). The UN effectively took Saddam's weapons programs underground, and ultimately (as history has proven), removed them completely. Totally. But still the US was not satisfied. Seeing every country as being as deceptive and cunning as it's own back-stage bodies, the US constructed hyperthetical scenerios about what Saddam COULD be doing (train carriages converted into chemical production fascilities, etc). 9/11 happened, and opportunists exploited the shock and fear this caused the American people (and international community at large) to take action against Saddam's government. 9/11 was the stone that started the avalanche. Al Quada was responsible. Taliban housed Al Quada. Taliban must turn over Al Quada or be destroyed. Taliban refused (possibly because it was like asking America to hand over the Roswell Craft). Taliban were destroyed. Saddam was next on the hit list. Saddam was told to hand over his WMD or be destroyed. Saddam swore he had none. UN backed him up. US refused to listen to any of them, slurred the UN and anyone who wouldn't jump on their bandwagon into the ground, and invaded Iraq illegally and immorally. Saddam went underground. A percentage of the Iraqii people rejected the American presence and were branded Terrorists. America attacked the "terrorists". More of the Iraqii people saw Americans attacking their allies, friends, neighbours, relatives, and fellow countrimen and more and more average citizens became angry enough to take up arms against the American presence (which on one occasion fired into an unarmed crowd with live ammunition; many other ignoble examples can be given). Increasingly the citizens of Iraq are being labelled terrorists, and are being attacked and killed by a force that simply isn't welcome there, and never had a right to be there in the first place. Where is this going? How will the avalanche fall? It is perfectly clear that the Iraqiis, like the Vietnamese before them, resent foreign occupation, and will simply never submit to it. For this reason Iraq will be two things: 1) A permanent warground until the foreign forces withdraw. 2) A breeding ground for what America is terming "terrorists", which are in fact people defending their own homeland using any crude means conceivable in exactly the same way that the American people themselves would, if faced with a superior enemy. The Iraqiis that America is terming "terrorists" never had any problem with America prior to America's invasion of their lands, and every day that the US remains, killing, wounding, and occupying, is another day that these Iraqiis are turned into Terrorists of a more true definition. People who feel vengeance and hatred and loss and frustration, and the overwhelming desire to take these frustrations out on America. These are mind-sets that should not be followed, but which should at the very least be understood, to prevent them from recurring, and from being created in the first place. Within the CIA, the FBI and other intelligence agencies in America (and other countries) there must surely be people who DO understand how this mindset comes about, and how to prevent it from recurring without having to resort to pruning fully-developped terrorist cells from the global community. Why, then, does this intelligence have no apparent bearing on America's foreign policy? Like Vietnam, America will come under mounting pressure, both domestically and abroad, to withdraw from Iraq. This pressure will come from mounting American death-tolls, mounting military expenditures, and mounting lists of defeats, both militarilly and economically. Iraq will simply become too politically and economically expensive to maintain, and America will withdraw, leaving behind it a fledging "democratic" government that will eventually (and perhaps very rapidly) be overthrown by an Iraqi warlord that knows America will not be able to come to its rescue. This government may even involve Saddam Hussein, if he is allowed to run in an election, because while he may come to power, his systems and heirarchy will not. Unless: The possibility exists, the opportunity exists, for the first time in history, that the American government itself will be hijacked, if it is not already. It's well known that Bush and Bin Laden have known each other for years, and some even describe them as friends. It is also well known that Bin Laden's family were escorted from the country prior to the announcement of Al Quada's involvement in 9/11. It is also well known that Bush has actively fought any investigation into 9/11. (For God's Sake, why??) It is also well known that Bush has actively fought many electoral systems, and perverted many rules to gain a voting numerical superiority, and in effect manipulate America's democracy to illigitimately come to power not once but twice. What will happen over the next 4 years? Bush has had to be careful this term because he needed to maintain at least a moderately even portion of the votes to be able to manipulate them safely to gain a second term. He has had to be careful not to stretch his power too far and destroy too many alliances (domestically and abroad), nor cause too many repurcussions. This term he needs to do so less, because every day he is in office is another day that his administration is constructing careful systems to ensure that it is still easier to remain in power the next election. What will happen at the end of Bush's second term? It is remotely possible that Bush's third term will not come to him by elected means. Or if it does, it will be so perverted and undemocratic as to be nothing short of an underhanded, insidious manipulation of the system... hang on a second... we're already at THAT stage. Perhaps to better understand the Bush agenda we need to understand that behind the stammering, illiterate, idiotic and crass Bush hides a team of very organised, well paid, intelligent and expert people that are working on any number of fronts to power the American President's public and not-so-public policies and presence. To truly understand what will happen at the transition between Bush's second and third terms, we need to better understand how the American politic system is structured, what rules can be manipulated, and how the American people can be confused and steered into supporting an illigitate government. Again. Each time it must become more drastic, and each time it must place more pressure on those that would stand up and threaten it. It will never be easier to remove Bush from office than it was three days ago. CSGD